Author summary
19%1 analyzed article/video1,711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randy Dotinga results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 335 hits. Analysis detected 2,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (8,240 of 9,471 authors). This Randy Dotinga is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Randy Dotinga
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
13%Randy Dotinga (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,844
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos