Topic summary
38% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parent Child Relationships results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 867 hits . Analysis detected 6,679 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,428 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,895 of 22,170 topics). This Parent Child Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Parent Child Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 14,428
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst