Topic summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palestine Israel Conflict results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,766 hits . Analysis detected 12,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,641 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (15,353 of 23,574 topics). This Palestine Israel Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Palestine Israel Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 14,641
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst