Author summary
98% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Lennard results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 17,431 hits . Analysis detected 104,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,881 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,224 of 8,593 authors). This Natasha Lennard is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Natasha Lennard
Author details
Total words: 58,881
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score15 analyzed articles58.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.6% 29.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 21.4% 21.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 21.4%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst