Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video99 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Novo Nordisk results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 507 faulty-reasoning hits from 396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (748 of 23,022 topics). This Novo Nordisk is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Novo Nordisk
Topic details
Total words: 396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
12.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles396 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 40.9%40.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 27.3%27.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 40.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos