Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Laws results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 374 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (18,387 of 21,656 topics). This New Laws is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
New Laws
Topic details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos