Topic summary
67% 35 analyzed articles/videos 2,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba Finals results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 11,922 hits . Analysis detected 84,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 104,932 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (18,259 of 22,683 topics). This Nba Finals is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Nba Finals
Topic details
Total words: 104,932
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score35 analyzed articles104.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst