Topic summary
⁠17%2 analyzed articles/videos1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Night Out results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 1,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,918 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (16,987 of 22,283 topics). This National Night Out is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
National Night Out

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos