‘National Night Out’ Returns to Pasadena 28%

By EDDIE RIVERA13%

8/4/2026, 11:08:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 560 faulty-reasoning hits from 424 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,225 of 27,733 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the article peer group.

Folding tables, event tents and a line of mounted police horses filled Jefferson Park on Tuesday evening, while Pasadena’s own Van Halen blared from the PA as the city joined thousands of communities across the country for National Night Out. 
The tradition began in 1984, when Mark Peskin, a resident of western Pennsylvania, looked for a simple way to bring neighbors together. 
His idea was modest. 
Families would turn on their porch lights, then sit outside and visit with the people next door. 
He set the date for the first Tuesday in August. 
Four decades later, the observance is marked in every state in the country, and organizers estimate millions of residents have taken part over the years. 
In Pasadena, that spirit translated into a park full of activity. 
City agencies set up resource tables across the grass, including the Pasadena Public Health Department’s Social and Mental Health Division, Pasadena Police recruiting, and food trucks offered burgers and tacos. 
Pasadena Police Department Senior Communications Coordinator Susana Porras noted the evening’s impact, explaining that her own neighborhood was experiencing crime issues years ago. 
“One of the first things that the Police Department asked me to do was to throw a block party,” she said. 
“This was back in 2009, and it worked out so well that I ended up doing a block party with my neighbors for the next ten years.” 
Nearby, a Home Depot booth drew a steady crowd of children building small wooden kits, among them miniature rocket launchers and tabletop football fields, complete with painted end zones and goalposts assembled by hand. 
Fire engines sat parked along the field, doors open for families to explore. 
Four Pasadena police officers rode through on horseback, their horses drawing a mix of stares and delighted exclamations from younger visitors, many of whom had never seen mounted officers up close before. 
And it wasn’t just about police. 
Fire Chief Chad Augustin said, “This is where we get to engage with the community in a non-emergency fashion, when stakes aren’t high. 
So often we’re responding to emergencies, someone has called 911, and we’re there to help them in their time of need. 
Here, we just get to have fun, talk and get to know each other and that makes this community great.” 
Under the park’s oak canopy, the scene echoed Peskin’s original premise, even if the format has grown considerably since those first porch-light gatherings. 
Pasadena’s turnout on Tuesday suggested the idea has lost none of its spirit four decades on. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.1%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 1.2%Confirmation Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%EDDIE RIVERA: 2.5%Pasadena Now: 2.2%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 2.6%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 5.4%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Hindsight Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%EDDIE RIVERA: 2.8%Pasadena Now: 4.4%Framing Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.6%Pasadena Now: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.7%Pasadena Now: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.7%EDDIE RIVERA: 3.6%Pasadena Now: 3.3%Optimism Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.9%Pasadena Now: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.3%Pasadena Now: 2.0%Negativity Bias5.0%This article: 5.4%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.3%Pasadena Now: 0.7%In-Group Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 4.3%Pasadena Now: 2.4%Halo Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.8%Pasadena Now: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.4%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.9%Pasadena Now: 0.9%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.7%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Circular Reasoning4.7%This article: 5.9%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.0%Pasadena Now: 1.1%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.8%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.6%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Bandwagon3.8%This article: 7.5%EDDIE RIVERA: 8.5%Pasadena Now: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.1%Pasadena Now: 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.8%EDDIE RIVERA: 3.9%Pasadena Now: 1.1%Anecdotal11.8%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 1.0%Pasadena Now: 1.0%Unattributed Quote5.0%This article: 5.4%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 17.5%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.4%Pasadena Now: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice17.5%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 2.5%Pasadena Now: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 0.0%Pasadena Now: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%EDDIE RIVERA: 2.9%Pasadena Now: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

424 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers32%attributed speech289writer words
Selected voice

Susana Porras

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words53% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+29.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Susana Porras: 29.6%29.6%Biased Writer Voice-25.6 ptsWriter: 25.6%Susana Porras: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.