Author summary
14% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EDDIE RIVERA results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 430 hits . Analysis detected 2,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,672 of 9,293 authors). This EDDIE RIVERA is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. EDDIE RIVERA
Author details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst