Topic summary
19% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Municipal Bonds results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 1,190 hits . Analysis detected 10,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,160 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (24,246 of 24,545 topics). This Municipal Bonds is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Municipal Bonds
Topic details
Total words: 31,160
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 0.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst