Topic summary
⁠59%5 analyzed articles/videos2,532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mobile Apps results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,054 hits. Analysis detected 6,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,439 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (15,867 of 22,911 topics). This Mobile Apps is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Mobile Apps

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos