Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Economics results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,684 hits. Analysis detected 9,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,722 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (6,564 of 24,545 topics). This Market Economics is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Market Economics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,722
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 23.1%23.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.1%25.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos