Topic summary
63% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Macos Security results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Loss Aversion , and Pessimism Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,185 hits . Analysis detected 5,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,104 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (15,031 of 24,551 topics). This Macos Security is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Macos Security
Topic details
Total words: 8,104
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst