Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Market results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 804 hits. Analysis detected 4,441 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,195 of 23,740 topics). This Luxury Market is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Luxury Market
Topic details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.2%36.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 25.8%25.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.1%21.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos