Topic summary
95% 28 analyzed articles/videos 14,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Layoffs results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 10,499 hits . Analysis detected 78,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,473 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,379 of 22,508 topics). This Layoffs is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Layoffs
Topic details
Total words: 60,473
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score28 analyzed articles60.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst