Topic summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos1,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Kardashian results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,116 hits. Analysis detected 6,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,816 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (17,101 of 23,690 topics). This Kim Kardashian is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Kim Kardashian
Topic details
Total words: 9,816
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos