Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katy Perry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 3,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (10,428 of 24,545 topics). This Katy Perry is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Katy Perry
Topic details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos