Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Radicalism results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 5,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,090 of 23,346 topics). This Jewish Radicalism is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Jewish Radicalism
Topic details
Total words: 8,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos