Topic summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These January 6 results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 678 hits . Analysis detected 2,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,450 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (14,815 of 23,284 topics). This January 6 is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. January 6
Topic details
Total words: 4,450
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst