Topic summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J D Vance results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,281 hits. Analysis detected 7,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (11,235 of 22,221 topics). This J D Vance is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
J D Vance
Topic details
Total words: 6,392
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos