Topic summary
76% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Strategies results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,764 hits . Analysis detected 16,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,590 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (10,050 of 22,836 topics). This Investment Strategies is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Investment Strategies
Topic details
Total words: 14,590
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst