Topic summary
73% 30 analyzed articles/videos 19,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 7,702 hits . Analysis detected 76,924 faulty-reasoning hits from 85,258 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,903 of 22,939 topics). This Investment is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Investment
Topic details
Total words: 85,258
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score30 analyzed articles85.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst