Topic summary
94% 3 analyzed articles/videos 630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inter Party Conflict results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,066 hits . Analysis detected 4,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,866 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,577 of 23,768 topics). This Inter Party Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Inter Party Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 4,866
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst