Amodei still refuses to back Flippo as rift between the two Republicans grows 60%

By Mini Racker41%

8/7/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,173 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (12,360 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the article peer group.

Retiring Rep. 
Mark Amodei (R-NV) has no plans to endorse the Republican nominee in the race to replace him  and in fact, the rift between the two has continued to fester. 
Two months after small business owner David Flippo (R) defeated Amodei's preferred successor and friend in the GOP primary for Nevada's 2nd Congressional District, the two still have not spoken. 
In an interview with Sam Shad on Nevada Newsmakers published on Wednesday, Amodei called Flippo "not my cup of tea" and said there was "no way" he was endorsing him. 
Amodei doubled down on his comments in a Thursday interview with The Nevada Independent . 
He doesn't think much of the Republican likely to replace him, though he previously said he would not endorse the Democrat . 
"Two cycles ago, I got a guy who couldn't get out of a Republican Assembly primary in Clark County," Amodei said, referring to Flippo. 
"Last cycle, couldn't get out of a Republican CD4 primary in Clark County, and then shows up and goes, 'I'm the answer for CD2 because it has historically been a Republican seat, and I love Donald Trump.' 
So it's like, 'OK, tell me about your deep love for the people you want to serve.'" 
Flippo is set to face Democratic nominee Teresa Benitez-Thompson in November. 
A Democrat has never won the Northern Nevada seat, where active Republican voters outnumber Democrats by more than 70,000. 
But early Wednesday, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee added the seat to its list of "districts in play"  a sign of a potential blue wave. 
According to his general consultant, Rory McShane, the retired lieutenant colonel has never requested Amodei's endorsement. 
But McShane said Flippo has called Amodei's personal number more than once to ask about transferring constituent casework. 
Speaking to The Nevada Independent on Thursday, Flippo also said that he had personally called and texted the congressman. 
"We're looking to have a clean handoff that's friendly and cordial," he said. 
"Want to find out what casework he's got working on, what bills he's working on that may not be done in time. 
What are his priorities? 
 He's a wealth of knowledge. 
 I think that would be a mistake on my behalf if I wasn't trying to connect with him." 
McShane was harsher. 
"It's a shame that Congressman Amodei is putting his political support and sour grapes over his preferred candidate not winning the primary [above meeting] with the likely incoming congressman to talk about transitioning casework," McShane told The Nevada Independent . 
"I would call that the definition of petty." 
Amodei said his chief of staff received one text from Flippo's campaign manager, who he derisively referred to as "Junior Jetson," about arranging a coffee meeting to discuss a project in the district. 
McShane provided The Nevada Independent a screenshot of a text message sent on July 28 from Flippo to Amodei's personal phone number. 
The text mentioned the same project Amodei brought up and inquired about a coffee meeting to discuss bills and other initiatives. 
The screenshot also included earlier messages to Amodei, but no replies. 
The congressman said Flippo never called him. 
"I know who calls me and I know who doesn't, and most of the world doesn't, so it's not hard to keep track of who does," Amodei said. 
McShane said Flippo is eager to lay the groundwork to help constituents. 
"As a combat veteran, it's very important to David that veterans who are getting their medals or getting their disability, that those people continue to be taken care of, that farmers and ranchers who have issues with [Bureau of Land Management]  that their issues don't get dropped," he said. 
But Amodei said the timing of the ask was presumptuous. 
"We're three months out from an election result, gentlemen," he said, emphasising the last word. 
"Why would I be talking to you about all this stuff three months before an election? 
 The need to talk about transferring anything to the next holder of CD2 three months before they count the votes is  and this seems to be a consistent theme  arrogant." 
He was especially incensed upon hearing from Shad that the Flippo campaign would not make the candidate available for an interview before the midterms, but that his staff would happily go in his place. 
Amodei said he wanted to judge Flippo based off his own words, not "the manufactured communications by his Las Vegas consultants." 
"Are you telling me that you're going to be telling this guy what to do?" 
the congressman asked. 
"That his name may be on the door, but you're the one who's calling the shots? 
That's not a message I'm going to support, just as a voter. 
 Those things I've just described to you strike me as fairly arrogant and incredibly, incredibly disrespectful to the people whose votes you want." 
Asked if what Shad said was accurate and if Flippo would do interviews or debates before November, McShane told The Nevada Independent via text that they are doing interviews  just not with programs whose reporters encourage support for Flippo's opponent, a reference to a tweet from Shad's co-host, Ray Hagar. 
Flippo said he had not watched Amodei's interview with Shad, but had heard about his comments suggesting they had nothing to sit and talk about. 
"I think we do have a reason to sit, and I think that we need to have that conversation," Flippo said. 
When Shad asked how Amodei planned to vote in the race, the congressman pointed out that a third-party candidate is also running. 
"I'll look at stuff," he later told The Nevada Independent . 
"But when I get more lies about outreach to this campaign, two texts which haven't been responded to, which act like, 'We're trying to set up the office,' well, listen, that's your prerogative, but arrogance is not one of the things that I look for in terms of support." 
As for his role on the national stage, Amodei said he had no interest in flexing his power vis a vis Trump. 
In five months, he said he'll be back home in Carson City doing yardwork. 
He reiterated that he's no Republican in Name Only. 
"My Trump voting record is like 98," Amodei said. 
"If he ups it 2 points to 100, then congratulations  if he's elected. 
But  this is the only seat in all 535 House and Senate that is solely responsible for Northern Nevada. 
That's the reason this seat gets up in the morning. 
 Tell me what your plan is for taking on that responsibility." 
About an hour later, the congressman called The Nevada Independent again. 
"They should be concentrating on how to get their guy elected, not worrying about what old 68-year-old retiring Amodei's doing, talking smack," he added. 
"I'm not running around worried about these two geniuses and their brand new Northern Nevadan  I'm finishing out my term strong." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%Mini Racker: 1.7%The Nevada Independent: 2.2%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.8%Mini Racker: 0.5%The Nevada Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.8%This article: 5.2%Mini Racker: 0.8%The Nevada Independent: 1.7%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 3.3%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Mini Racker: 1.3%The Nevada Independent: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias2.4%This article: 1.1%Mini Racker: 5.3%The Nevada Independent: 4.4%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Mini Racker: 1.7%The Nevada Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%Mini Racker: 4.1%The Nevada Independent: 4.5%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 10.4%Mini Racker: 2.1%The Nevada Independent: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 2.6%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 2.0%The Nevada Independent: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.8%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Mini Racker: 0.5%The Nevada Independent: 0.6%Halo Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Mini Racker: 1.3%The Nevada Independent: 0.9%Recency Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Mini Racker: 6.5%The Nevada Independent: 1.8%Ad Hominem12.3%This article: 1.8%Mini Racker: 1.1%The Nevada Independent: 0.5%Straw Man1.8%This article: 2.4%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 1.6%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 1.3%Mini Racker: 0.9%The Nevada Independent: 0.8%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.8%Mini Racker: 0.1%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.8%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 2.2%The Nevada Independent: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 1.9%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Red Herring1.9%This article: 2.2%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 9.4%Mini Racker: 3.1%The Nevada Independent: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 1.4%Mini Racker: 0.4%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 1.6%Mini Racker: 1.5%The Nevada Independent: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.6%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.9%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.9%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.3%Mini Racker: 1.5%The Nevada Independent: 1.1%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 2.2%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.2%This article: 0.7%Mini Racker: 0.9%The Nevada Independent: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.7%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.2%The Nevada Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.5%The Nevada Independent: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.8%Mini Racker: 0.7%The Nevada Independent: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 3.7%Mini Racker: 1.7%The Nevada Independent: 2.7%Biased Writer Voice3.7%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.8%The Nevada Independent: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 2.0%The Nevada Independent: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mini Racker: 0.6%The Nevada Independent: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1173 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech436writer words
Selected voice

Rory McShane

100%flagged-word coverage
116 attributed words16% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.9 ptsWriter: 9.9%Rory McShane: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Rory McShane: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.