Topic summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indigenous History results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 1,213 hits . Analysis detected 14,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,876 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (22,767 of 23,517 topics). This Indigenous History is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Indigenous History
Topic details
Total words: 33,876
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 0.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst