Author summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Schafer results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,728 of 9,471 authors). This Amelia Schafer is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Amelia Schafer
Author details
Total words: 3,772
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst