Topic summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immunotherapy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 97 hits . Analysis detected 598 faulty-reasoning hits from 600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (4,079 of 24,545 topics). This Immunotherapy is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Immunotherapy
Topic details
Total words: 600
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles600 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst