Topic summary
63% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,005 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imax results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 975 hits . Analysis detected 6,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,020 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (12,493 of 23,401 topics). This Imax is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Imax
Topic details
Total words: 8,020
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst