Topic summary
⁠99%4 analyzed articles/videos3,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Violence results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 4,059 hits. Analysis detected 22,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,118 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,763 of 24,561 topics). This Ice Violence is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Ice Violence
Topic details
Total words: 13,118
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.9%30.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos