Topic summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger Strike results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 834 hits. Analysis detected 6,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,456 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,193 of 24,545 topics). This Hunger Strike is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Hunger Strike
Topic details
Total words: 7,456
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos