Author summary
65%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sonal Nain results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 2,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (4,258 of 9,468 authors). This Sonal Nain is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Sonal Nain
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
55%Sonal Nain (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos