Author summary
74% 37 analyzed articles/videos 41,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aisha Wallace-Palomares results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 26,124 hits . Analysis detected 157,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 151,906 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,021 of 8,706 authors). This Aisha Wallace-Palomares is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Aisha Wallace-Palomares
Author details
Total words: 151,906
Article count: 37
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score37 analyzed articles151.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst