Topic summary
⁠52%5 analyzed articles/videos4,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humanoid Robots results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,399 hits. Analysis detected 12,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,024 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (19,186 of 24,495 topics). This Humanoid Robots is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos