Author summary
88%3 analyzed articles/videos1,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shivali Best results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,037 hits. Analysis detected 10,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,472 of 8,774 authors). This Shivali Best is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Shivali Best
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
72%Shivali Best (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,772
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.8%6.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate