Author summary
88% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shivali Best results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,037 hits . Analysis detected 10,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,472 of 8,774 authors). This Shivali Best is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Shivali Best
Author details
Total words: 8,772
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst