Topic summary
29% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Interest results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,687 hits . Analysis detected 10,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,964 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (21,512 of 22,614 topics). This Human Interest is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Human Interest
Topic details
Total words: 23,964
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles24K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst