Author summary
⁠3%2 analyzed articles/videos1,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Baker results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 980 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (8,529 of 8,616 authors). This Sophie Baker is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Sophie Baker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠1%Sophie Baker (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,748
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.0% percentile
0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos