Topic summary
⁠12%3 analyzed articles/videos163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Fire results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 353 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,196 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (14,098 of 23,996 topics). This House Fire is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
House Fire
Topic details
Total words: 1,196
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos