Publication summary
12%9 analyzed articles/videos565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KOLD results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 1,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,520 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (184 of 584 publications). This KOLD is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
KOLD
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Greenville News1%
1%The Commercial Appeal1%
69%KOLD (selected)3%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%Lookout12%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 3,520
Article count: 9
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

69% percentile
025507510068.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate