Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hope Scholarship Program results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,949 of 23,637 topics). This Hope Scholarship Program is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Hope Scholarship Program
Topic details
Total words: 812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles812 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.4%17.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos