Topic summary
⁠10%3 analyzed articles/videos3,490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Buying results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 4,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,960 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (22,560 of 23,197 topics). This Home Buying is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group.
Home Buying
Topic details
Total words: 13,960
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751002.7% percentile
0.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos