Topic summary
64% 24 analyzed articles/videos 13,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Insurance results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 4,810 hits . Analysis detected 41,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,393 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (22,411 of 23,996 topics). This Health Insurance is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Health Insurance
Topic details
Total words: 69,393
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score24 analyzed articles69.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst