Topic summary
98% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Efficiency results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 3,279 hits . Analysis detected 20,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,483 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (10,436 of 24,545 topics). This Government Efficiency is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Government Efficiency
Topic details
Total words: 15,483
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst