Topic summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos1,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Dysphoria results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (12,472 of 24,100 topics). This Gender Dysphoria is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Gender Dysphoria
Topic details
Total words: 6,600
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos