Topic summary
76%3 analyzed articles/videos1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Products results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 4,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (10,271 of 24,545 topics). This Future Products is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Future Products
Topic details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate