9to5Mac75%

Mac Studio: Here’s what Apple has in store for this fall and beyond 61%

By Michael Burkhardt86%

8/1/2026, 8:18:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Anchoring Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 474 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (11,954 of 30,190 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the article peer group.

Later this fall, Apple will be updating the Mac Studio for the first time since early 2025. 
That may be just over a year ago, but it’s significant for one main reason: the highest end Mac Studio is still M3 based, as Apple never made an Ultra version of the M4 chipset. 
Here’s what to expect with the next generation Mac Studio, as well as in the future. 
### This fall 
The M5-based Mac Studio refresh was initially set for mid 2026, but the ongoing memory shortage caused a bit of a timeline slip. 
Now, rumors suggest a debut as early as October. 
With this refresh, Apple will be introducing the M5 Max and M5 Ultra Mac Studio, with the M5 Ultra potentially going as high as 768GB of RAM. 
It’s unclear if Apple will be able to ship this much memory because of supply constraints. 
M5 Ultra will debut with up to 36 CPU cores and 80 GPU cores, and it’ll bring a considerable performance gain over the existing M3 Ultra model. 
Mac Studio used to come in at $1999 and $3999 respectively for the M4 Max and M3 Ultra variants, but after the price hikes, they now come in at $2499 and $5299  and it’s possible they’ll go even higher with the M5 models. 
### 2028 
In 2028, Apple will be updating the Mac Studio yet again with M7 Max and M7 Ultra chips, and these ones should be more substantial. 
For one, the M7 family of chips is rumored to take massive leaps in AI performance, potentially making the M7 Ultra an incredible beast when it comes to running on-device LLMs. 
It’s also possible there’ll be design tweaks, though it’s unclear what those would be. 
Beyond the performance gains of the M7 family, there’s two upgrades of note with the M7 Ultra Mac Studio: a new heatsink for better sustained performance, and the potential to support up to 1.5TB of RAM. 
Once again, that’s subject to supply availability  but Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple is developing the M7 Ultra to support 1.5TB of unified memory. 
Fun fact: that’ll finally bring it back in line with the 2019 Mac Pro, which supported up to 1.5TB of RAM  the most in any Mac. 
Based on Apple’s current memory pricing, upgrading from 128GB of memory to 1.5TB of memory could cost around $35,000  not accounting for required CPU upgrades. 
**My favorite Apple accessory recommendations:** 
* Anker MagSafe/Qi2 Ultra-Slim Battery Pack 
* AirPods Pro 3 (2x ANC vs AirPods Pro 2!) 
* Anker Nano 45W Fast Charger with Smart Display 
* Anker Nano 13-in-1 MacBook Docking Station 
* Logitech MX Master 4 Mouse for Mac 
* Belkin Qi2 3-in-1 MagSafe Charging Stand 
*Follow Michael: X/Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.6%Michael Burkhardt: 3.7%9to5Mac: 2.9%Confirmation Bias7.6%This article: 9.3%Michael Burkhardt: 2.5%9to5Mac: 1.9%Anchoring Bias9.3%This article: 1.9%Michael Burkhardt: 2.7%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic1.9%This article: 7.4%Michael Burkhardt: 2.7%9to5Mac: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Michael Burkhardt: 4.1%9to5Mac: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias16.9%This article: 2.1%Michael Burkhardt: 5.3%9to5Mac: 4.4%Framing Effect2.1%This article: 9.3%Michael Burkhardt: 2.2%9to5Mac: 1.1%Loss Aversion9.3%This article: 5.7%Michael Burkhardt: 1.2%9to5Mac: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Michael Burkhardt: 5.7%9to5Mac: 3.2%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 3.4%Michael Burkhardt: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 4.6%9to5Mac: 3.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Michael Burkhardt: 4.1%9to5Mac: 2.7%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Michael Burkhardt: 1.6%9to5Mac: 1.4%Recency Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Michael Burkhardt: 3.3%9to5Mac: 2.8%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 3.3%9to5Mac: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Michael Burkhardt: 6.5%9to5Mac: 4.5%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.4%9to5Mac: 1.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.9%Michael Burkhardt: 2.2%9to5Mac: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 2.8%9to5Mac: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Michael Burkhardt: 2.6%9to5Mac: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 1.1%9to5Mac: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 10.9%9to5Mac: 5.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.1%Michael Burkhardt: 1.8%9to5Mac: 1.6%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Burkhardt: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Michael Burkhardt: 19.4%9to5Mac: 13.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.0%

474 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.