Topic summary
⁠61%3 analyzed articles/videos1,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Silicon results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 3,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,580 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (12,396 of 24,509 topics). This Apple Silicon is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Apple Silicon
Topic details
Total words: 5,580
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos