Topic summary
12% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fugitive Apprehension results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 815 hits . Analysis detected 6,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,140 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (20,292 of 23,726 topics). This Fugitive Apprehension is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Fugitive Apprehension
Topic details
Total words: 12,140
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst