Topic summary
⁠59%7 analyzed articles/videos12,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Politics & Elections results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 3,898 hits. Analysis detected 36,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,250 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (19,667 of 22,440 topics). This Foreign Politics & Elections is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Foreign Politics & Elections

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles56.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos