Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 1,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dafna H. Rand results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 561 hits . Analysis detected 2,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,663 of 9,471 authors). This Dafna H. Rand is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Dafna H. Rand
Author details
Total words: 4,584
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst